The meter stayed. The bill fell.

By Hew Gibbs. Names have been changed.

When I ring Sam, I’m calling someone with a supermarket to run. There is the register, the phone and, alongside the groceries, a sideline selling barbecue chicken and chips. Energy paperwork has to find its place among all of that.

I had worked with Sam at Lantern Pantry for years. He had been a happy Bulk Energy customer, and we had already worked through some awkward metering problems together. Back in 2019, a transfer was blocked by an existing agreement. When I obtained the paperwork, there was a future renewal as well. Later, we arranged new electricity and metering agreements. I checked his bills and followed up when the metering charge did not match the contract.

Then another brokerage, Paper Kite Energy, persuaded Sam to give it authority to sign energy and metering contracts on his behalf. In my opinion, it abused that authority and broke his trust. Here’s how it played out.

In early 2026, he asked me to tender his electricity again and forwarded the other broker’s latest proposal. I gathered competing offers. I also asked the metering provider for his current agreement and its end date.

We discovered a new metering agreement that Sam had not signed himself. The other broker had used its authority to sign on his behalf, and the agreement ran until the end of 2029.

The annual metering charge was $2,998 excluding GST, before the retailer’s administration charge. By December 2025, that line on his bill was equivalent to $3,183 a year.

That was a shock for Sam. He had come back to me for a better deal, and we were looking at years of an expensive commitment. For someone running a shop, a recurring charge is money the business has to keep earning, year after year.

I could find cheaper metering. What worried me was getting him out of the existing agreement without a large penalty. In February, I explained that concern to him. I could not honestly promise a saving until we knew whether he could obtain it.

Sam kept at it. In March, he told me he could leave the metering agreement at the end of that year and asked me to tender again. I refreshed the electricity offers and helped him secure a new agreement. Then we went back to the metering: could we bring that change forward another six months?

I helped Sam put the request to the existing provider. On 24 March, it confirmed the old agreement would end on 30 June 2026. Two days later, he signed a new direct metering agreement, starting on 1 July. I lodged it with the relevant providers and put an August reminder in my diary to check the July bill. No break fees were charged in this case.

Then the meter replacement stalled.

The tenant had agreed to the visit, but the body corporate refused access. We had the new agreement; now the physical change was stuck. More appointments and a possible interruption to the shop’s power were hardly the outcome I wanted for Sam.

I had recently used an assignment clause for another customer. It allowed the new agreement to operate with the existing metering provider and equipment. I asked whether we could do the same here, then followed it up.

In August, the metering provider formally accepted the assignment. Sam could keep the meter already on the wall. There was no need for an exchange or the outage that went with it.

The lower charge was already on his July bill. The daily metering rate had fallen from $8.720548 to $3.041096. On the same annual basis, that was $3,183 down to $1,110 excluding GST—approximately $2,073 less, or 65.1%.

That is the metering charge, not the whole electricity bill. Both bills showed the same retailer and meter. The lower rate began on the agreed July start date, without waiting for the original 2029 expiry or a replacement meter.

I remember Sam being delighted, and relieved. We had found a way through the expensive agreement and then through the practical problem that could have held up the change.

Sam still had his register, his phone and his chicken and chips to deal with. He had told me he made about a dollar profit on each chicken-and-chips deal. At that margin, the annualised saving was the equivalent of about 2,073 fewer deals to cook just to cover the metering cost. The meter stayed. The fryer could use a breather, too.